- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forklift Truck/
- Jungheinrich EFG 213 vs. Clark Michigan CGC50
Jungheinrich EFG 213 vs. Clark Michigan CGC50
4 reasons to buy Jungheinrich EFG 213:
Sizes
Turn radius | 1440 mm and 2494 mm | 42 % less or 1054 mm |
Clearance | 100 mm and 96 mm | 4 % more or 4 mm |
Lifting mechanism
Lifting speed | 36 m/min and 27.1 m/min | 25 % more or 8.9 m/min |
Lowering speed | 33 m/min and 23.8 m/min | 28 % more or 9.2 m/min |
3 reasons to buy Clark Michigan CGC50:
Operation
Rear wheels number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Maximum speed | 19.5 km/h and 16 km/h | 18 % more or 3.5 km/h |
Lifting mechanism
Lifting capacity | 4535.9 kg and 1300 kg | 71 % more or 3235.9 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 1249 mm and 1790 mm |
Height to overhead guard upper part | 1960 mm and 2215 mm |
Length up to fork surface | 1786 mm and 2672 mm |
Overall width | 1060 mm and 1392 mm |
Overall height with mast lowered | 2000 mm and 2281 mm |
Maximum fork height | 3000 mm and 4529 mm |
Operation
Front wheels number | 2 and 2 |
Working weight | 2800 kg and 6736.8 kg |
Type of tyre | pneumatic and Cushion |
Motor
Model | Electric Motor and Vortec 4300LT |
Lifting mechanism
Mast forward tilting | 7 degrees and 9 degrees |
Mast backwards tilting | 7 degrees and 8 degrees |
Images
Sizes
1. Length up to fork surface | 1786 mm | 1. Length up to fork surface | 2672 mm |
2. Overall width | 1060 mm | 2. Overall width | 1392 mm |
3. Overall height with mast lowered | 2000 mm | 3. Overall height with mast lowered | 2281 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1249 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1790 mm |
5. Clearance | 100 mm | 5. Clearance | 96 mm |
6. Height to overhead guard upper part | 1960 mm | 6. Height to overhead guard upper part | 2215 mm |
7. Maximum fork height | 3000 mm | 7. Maximum fork height | 4529 mm |
Lifting mechanism
8. Mast forward tilting | 7 degrees | 8. Mast forward tilting | 9 degrees |
9. Mast backwards tilting | 7 degrees | 9. Mast backwards tilting | 8 degrees |


