- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 511 vs. Tigercat L830C
Caterpillar 511 vs. Tigercat L830C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 511:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 760 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
| Operational weight without attachment | 24362 kg and 32658.6 kg | 25 % less or 8296.6 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat L830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 184.2 kW | 18 % more or 39.5 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 33112.2 kg and 30391 kg | 8 % more or 2721.2 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 8458 mm and 4750 mm |
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 7100 kg and 4585 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | degrees and 26 degrees |
| Lateral part | degrees and 22 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 8458 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 762 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |