- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 511 vs. Tigercat LX870C
Caterpillar 511 vs. Tigercat LX870C
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 511:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 710 mm | 7 % more or 52 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 24362 kg and 34926.6 kg | 30 % less or 10564.6 kg |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LX870C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 184.2 kW | 18 % more or 39.5 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm and 3710 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 7100 kg and 7850 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | degrees and 20 degrees |
| Lateral part | degrees and 15 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 762 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |