- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 522 vs. Tigercat 860C
Caterpillar 522 vs. Tigercat 860C
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 522:
Sizes
| Clearance | 838 mm and 710 mm | 15 % more or 128 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 34246 kg and 27215.5 kg | 21 % more or 7030.5 kg |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 30410 kg | 10 % less or 3080 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 8636 mm and 5380 mm |
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3275 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3861 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 200 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 7100 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 8636 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5380 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3861 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 838 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |