- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 532 vs. Madill 1250
Caterpillar 532 vs. Madill 1250
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 710.2 mm | 20 % more or 178.8 mm |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 90 amperes | 5 % more or 5 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 7.8 l. | 11 % more or 1.0 l. |
Carrier
| Traction force | 38555 kg and 32114.3 kg | 17 % more or 6440.7 kg |
4 reasons to buy Madill 1250:
Sizes
| Maximum radius | 8433.8 mm and 8100 mm | 4 % more or 333.8 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 832.8 l. and 530 l. | 36 % more or 302.8 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 227.1 l. and 39 l. | 83 % more or 188.1 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 212.5 kW and 211.8 kW | 0 % more or 0.7 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3301 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3605.8 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Isuzu |
| Model | C9 ACERT and 6HK1X |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3301 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3605.8 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 710.2 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |