- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 541 vs. Madill 1250
Caterpillar 541 vs. Madill 1250
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 541:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 710.2 mm | 20 % more or 178.8 mm |
| Maximum radius | 8600 mm and 8433.8 mm | 2 % more or 166.2 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 832.8 l. | 29 % more or 348.2 l. |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 90 amperes | 5 % more or 5 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 7.8 l. | 11 % more or 1.0 l. |
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 212.5 kW | 7 % more or 14.9 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 34246 kg and 32114.3 kg | 6 % more or 2131.7 kg |
1 reasons to buy Madill 1250:
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 227.1 l. and 39 l. | 83 % more or 188.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3556 mm and 3605.8 mm |
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 3301 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Isuzu |
| Model | C9 ACERT and 6HK1X |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 710.2 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3301 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3556 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3605.8 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |