- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill T2250C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill T2250C
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 737.6 mm | 17 % more or 151.4 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 1097.8 l. | 7 % more or 83.2 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 47174 kg and 40369.7 kg | 14 % more or 6804.3 kg |
4 reasons to buy Madill T2250C:
Sizes
| Maximum radius | 8793.5 mm and 8600 mm | 2 % more or 193.5 mm |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 219.6 l. and 39 l. | 82 % more or 180.6 l. |
| Generator current strength | 100 amperes and 95 amperes | 5 % more or 5 amperes |
Motor
| Displacement | 8.9 l. and 8.8 l. | 1 % more or 0.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 3453.4 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3910.6 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL |
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 227.4 kW |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 711.2 mm |
| Track width | 2591 mm and 3454.4 mm |
Alignment device
| Front end | 20 degrees and 27 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
Carrier
| 6. Track width | 2591 mm | 6. Track width | 3454.4 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |