- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill T2250C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill T2250C
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 737.6 mm | 17 % more or 151.4 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 1097.8 l. | 7 % more or 83.2 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 47174 kg and 40369.7 kg | 14 % more or 6804.3 kg |
4 reasons to buy Madill T2250C:
Sizes
Maximum radius | 8793.5 mm and 8600 mm | 2 % more or 193.5 mm |
Operation
Generator current strength | 100 amperes and 95 amperes | 5 % more or 5 amperes |
Engine oil volume | 219.6 l. and 39 l. | 82 % more or 180.6 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 8.9 l. and 8.8 l. | 1 % more or 0.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3327 mm and 3453.4 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3910.6 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | C9 ACERT and QSL |
Full power | 227.4 kW and 227.4 kW |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 711.2 mm |
Track width | 2591 mm and 3454.4 mm |
Alignment device
Front end | 20 degrees and 27 degrees |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm |
5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
Carrier
6. Track width | 2591 mm | 6. Track width | 3454.4 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |