- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat 718E
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat 718E
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 510 mm | 43 % more or 379 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 314 l. | 73 % more or 867 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 147 l. | 60 % more or 223 l. |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 80 amperes | 16 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 129 kW | 43 % more or 98.4 kW |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 718E:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 11158.4 kg and 35680 kg | 69 % less or 24521.6 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 9423 mm and 5410 mm |
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 2540 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3350 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSB6.7 3 level |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5410 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 2540 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3350 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 510 mm |