- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat 822C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat 822C
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 760 mm | 15 % more or 129 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 490 l. | 59 % more or 691 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 47174 kg and 25401.2 kg | 46 % more or 21772.8 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 24494 kg and 35680 kg | 31 % less or 11186 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3330 mm |
Dimensional length | 9423 mm and 4445 mm |
Overall width | 3327 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9400 kg and 4025 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4445 mm |
2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm |
5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |