- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX822C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX822C
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 760 mm | 15 % more or 129 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 490 l. | 59 % more or 691 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 47174 kg and 29937.1 kg | 37 % more or 17236.9 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
| Operational weight without attachment | 32660 kg and 35680 kg | 8 % less or 3020 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 9423 mm and 4750 mm |
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 3275 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 710 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 200 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9400 kg and 4581.3 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | 20 degrees and 26 degrees |
| Lateral part | 11 degrees and 20 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |