- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX830C
Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat LX830C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 530 l. | 55 % more or 651 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX830C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 32660 kg and 35680 kg | 8 % less or 3020 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3327 mm and 3330 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9400 kg and 4585 kg |
Alignment device
Lateral part | 11 degrees and 22 degrees |
Front end | 20 degrees and 26 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |


