- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 753J vs. Tigercat 870C
John Deere 753J vs. Tigercat 870C
3 reasons to buy John Deere 753J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 740 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 30 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 22897.3 kg and 30331.7 kg | 25 % less or 7434.4 kg |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm and 4800 mm | 33 % less or 1599.6 mm |
7 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 136 l. | 28 % more or 54 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 583 l. | 40 % more or 387 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 33112.2 kg and 26036.2 kg | 21 % more or 7076.0 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8382 mm | 1 % more or 78 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3180 mm and 3300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm and 3300 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1930 mm and 1420 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4717.4 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3180 mm | 2. Overall width | 3300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 740 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1930 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8382 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |