- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 759J vs. Tigercat LX822C
John Deere 759J vs. Tigercat LX822C
2 reasons to buy John Deere 759J:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 27242.8 kg and 32660 kg | 17 % less or 5417.2 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 583 l. and 490 l. | 16 % more or 93 l. |
8 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
Clearance | 760 mm and 711 mm | 6 % more or 49 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 165 l. and 136 l. | 18 % more or 29 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 29937.1 kg and 26036.2 kg | 13 % more or 3900.9 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8300 mm | 1 % more or 80 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 3530 mm | 8 % less or 280 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3048 mm and 3275 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3930 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 710 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4720 kg and 4581.3 kg |
Alignment device
Front end | 27 degrees and 26 degrees |
Rear | 10 degrees and 6 degrees |
Lateral part | 18 degrees and 20 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3048 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3930 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
5. Clearance | 711 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 3530 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8300 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm |