vs.

      John Deere 903J vs. Tigercat 860C

      6 reasons to buy John Deere 903J:

      Sizes

      Clearance 749 mm and 710 mm 5 % more or 39 mm

      Operation

      Hydraulic system fluid volume 311 l. and 190 l. 39 % more or 121 l.
      Fuel Capacity 1116.7 l. and 970 l. 13 % more or 146.7 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Carrier

      Traction force 33701.9 kg and 27215.5 kg 19 % more or 6486.4 kg
      Rolling bearings number on either side 9 and 8 11 % more or 1

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 80 amperes 27 % more or 30 amperes
      Operational weight without attachment 27330 kg and 28730.5 kg 5 % less or 1400.5 kg

      Motor

      Full power 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW 2 % more or 4.5 kW

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm and 8400 mm 1 % more or 60 mm
      Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm and 5000 mm 4 % less or 200 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Height to cab upper part 3860 mm and 3300 mm
      Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm and 1445 mm
      Overall width 3170 mm and 3275 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Manufacturer John Deere and Cummins
      Model 6081H and QSL9

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm and 610 mm
      Caterpillar track pitch 216 mm and 200 mm

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 6430 kg and 6040 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3170 mm 2. Overall width 3275 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3860 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3300 mm
      5. Clearance 749 mm 5. Clearance 710 mm
      8. Rear platform swing radius 3000 mm 8. Rear platform swing radius 1445 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 5000 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8400 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm