- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 822C
John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 822C
6 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 760 mm | 1 % more or 10 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 626.7 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 145.4 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 25401.2 kg | 25 % more or 8300.7 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Operational weight without attachment | 24494 kg and 34427.7 kg | 29 % less or 9933.7 kg |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8360 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5030 mm | 35 % less or 1780 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3330 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 200 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6432 kg and 4025 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm |
5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 5030 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm |