vs.

      John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 822C

      6 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:

      Sizes

      Clearance 770 mm and 760 mm 1 % more or 10 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1116.7 l. and 490 l. 56 % more or 626.7 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 310.4 l. and 165 l. 47 % more or 145.4 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Carrier

      Traction force 33701.9 kg and 25401.2 kg 25 % more or 8300.7 kg
      Rolling bearings number on either side 10 and 8 20 % more or 2

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 80 amperes 27 % more or 30 amperes
      Operational weight without attachment 24494 kg and 34427.7 kg 29 % less or 9933.7 kg

      Motor

      Full power 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW 2 % more or 4.5 kW

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm and 8360 mm 0 % more or 20 mm
      Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm and 5030 mm 35 % less or 1780 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Height to cab upper part 4000 mm and 3330 mm
      Overall width 3330 mm and 3330 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Model 6081H and QSL9
      Manufacturer John Deere and Cummins

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 216 mm and 200 mm
      Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm and 610 mm

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 6432 kg and 4025 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3330 mm 2. Overall width 3330 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 4000 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3330 mm
      5. Clearance 770 mm 5. Clearance 760 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 5030 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8360 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm