- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 845C
John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat 845C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 770 mm and 690 mm | 10 % more or 80 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 146.7 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 120.4 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 219.2 kW and 205.1 kW | 6 % more or 14.1 kW |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
| Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 27215.5 kg | 19 % more or 6486.4 kg |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm and 8050 mm | 4 % more or 310 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 25490 kg and 34427.7 kg | 26 % less or 8937.7 kg |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 80 amperes | 43 % more or 60 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm and 5030 mm | 17 % less or 865 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3435 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3360 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm and 1020 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 6081H and 906 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 200 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6432 kg and 4990 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 690 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5030 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm |