- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat LX870C
John Deere 909J vs. Tigercat LX870C
5 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 770 mm and 710 mm | 8 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 34427.7 kg and 34926.6 kg | 1 % less or 498.9 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 146.7 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 120.4 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX870C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8360 mm | 1 % more or 100 mm |
| Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 5030 mm | 5 % less or 230 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3710 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6432 kg and 7850 kg |
Alignment device
| Rear | 26 degrees and 7 degrees |
| Front end | 7 degrees and 20 degrees |
| Lateral part | 14 degrees and 15 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5030 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8360 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |