- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 959J vs. Tigercat 870C
John Deere 959J vs. Tigercat 870C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 959J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 710 mm | 8 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 147 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 39145 kg and 33112.2 kg | 15 % more or 6032.8 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm and 8460 mm | 1 % more or 70 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Operational weight without attachment | 30331.7 kg and 36015.2 kg | 16 % less or 5683.5 kg |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219 kW | 2 % more or 4.7 kW |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 5180 mm | 7 % less or 380 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3300 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3300 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 3200 mm and 1420 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3300 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 3200 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 5180 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |