- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- John Deere 959J vs. Tigercat L830C
John Deere 959J vs. Tigercat L830C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 959J:
Sizes
Clearance | 770 mm and 760 mm | 1 % more or 10 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 627 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 146 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 39145 kg and 33112.2 kg | 15 % more or 6032.8 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm and 8380 mm | 2 % more or 150 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat L830C:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 32658.6 kg and 36015.2 kg | 9 % less or 3356.6 kg |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219 kW | 2 % more or 4.7 kW |
Booms
Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5180 mm | 37 % less or 1930 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 216 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Alignment device
Front end | 7 degrees and 26 degrees |
Rear | 26 degrees and 8 degrees |
Lateral part | 14 degrees and 22 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
5. Clearance | 770 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 5180 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm |


