- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill 2200B vs. Tigercat 845C
Madill 2200B vs. Tigercat 845C
3 reasons to buy Madill 2200B:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 690 mm | 9 % more or 72 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 34291.6 kg and 27215.5 kg | 21 % more or 7076.1 kg |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 70 amperes | 50 % more or 70 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 Berco track chain roller on each side | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3148.6 mm and 3435 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm and 3360 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm and 1020 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | QSL and 906 |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9888.3 kg and 4990 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3148.6 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 762 mm | 5. Clearance | 690 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |