- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill 2250B vs. Tigercat 870C
Madill 2250B vs. Tigercat 870C
4 reasons to buy Madill 2250B:
Sizes
Clearance | 737.6 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 27.6 mm |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 33112.2 kg | 18 % more or 7257.5 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3200.4 mm and 3300 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm and 3300 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm and 1420 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 610 mm |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 9 |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 9888.3 kg and 6040 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3300 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
5. Clearance | 737.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |