- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill 2250C vs. Tigercat 845C
Madill 2250C vs. Tigercat 845C
4 reasons to buy Madill 2250C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 737.6 mm and 690 mm | 6 % more or 47.6 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1097.8 l. and 970 l. | 12 % more or 127.8 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 27215.5 kg | 33 % more or 13154.2 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 100 amperes | 29 % more or 40 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 9 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3200.4 mm and 3435 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm and 1020 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | QSL and 906 |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 9 |
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 690 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |