- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill 3200C vs. Tigercat 860C
Madill 3200C vs. Tigercat 860C
4 reasons to buy Madill 3200C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 710 mm | 7 % more or 52 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 35833.8 kg and 27215.5 kg | 24 % more or 8618.3 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 889.6 l. | 8 % more or 80.4 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 3221.7 mm and 1445 mm |
| Overall width | 3200.4 mm and 3275 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | S50 and QSL9 |
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
| Manufacturer | Detroit diesel and Cummins |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 762 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3221.7 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |