- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill T2250C vs. John Deere 853J
Madill T2250C vs. John Deere 853J
9 reasons to buy Madill T2250C:
Sizes
| Maximum radius | 8793.5 mm and 8400 mm | 4 % more or 393.5 mm |
Operation
| Engine oil volume | 219.6 l. and 28 l. | 87 % more or 191.6 l. |
| Generator current strength | 100 amperes and 80 amperes | 20 % more or 20 amperes |
| Maximum speed | 4.5 km/h and 4.2 km/h | 7 % more or 0.3 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 219 kW | 4 % more or 8.4 kW |
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1900 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Displacement | 8.9 l. and 8.1 l. | 9 % more or 0.8 l. |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 25265.1 kg | 37 % more or 15104.6 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 853J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 739 mm and 737.6 mm | 0 % more or 1.4 mm |
Operation
| Specific ground pressure | 64.1 kPa and 67.6 kPa | 5 % less or 3.5 kPa |
| Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 1097.8 l. | 2 % more or 18.9 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 3170 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm and 3780 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm and 3000 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL and 6081H |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Track width | 3454.4 mm and 2570 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3170 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3780 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 739 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm |
Carrier
| 6. Track width | 3454.4 mm | 6. Track width | 2570 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |