- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Madill T2250C vs. Tigercat 860C
Madill T2250C vs. Tigercat 860C
6 reasons to buy Madill T2250C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 737.6 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 27.6 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1097.8 l. and 970 l. | 12 % more or 127.8 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 27215.5 kg | 33 % more or 13154.2 kg |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 100 amperes | 9 % more or 10 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm and 3300 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm and 1445 mm |
| Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 3275 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |