- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 726E vs. Tigercat 870C
Tigercat 726E vs. Tigercat 870C
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 726E:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 12765 kg and 30331.7 kg | 58 % less or 17566.7 kg |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 215 l. and 190 l. | 12 % more or 25 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 710 mm and 585 mm | 18 % more or 125 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 475 l. | 51 % more or 495 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 171.5 kW | 23 % more or 52.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 6070 mm and 5540 mm |
| Overall width | 3000 mm and 3300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3380 mm and 3300 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB6.7 3 level and QSL9 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3000 mm | 2. Overall width | 3300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3380 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 585 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 6070 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5540 mm |