- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 822C vs. Caterpillar 522
Tigercat 822C vs. Caterpillar 522
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
| Operational weight without attachment | 24494 kg and 30410 kg | 19 % less or 5916 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 522:
Sizes
| Clearance | 838 mm and 760 mm | 9 % more or 78 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 34246 kg and 25401.2 kg | 26 % more or 8844.8 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4445 mm and 8636 mm |
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3200 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3861 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4025 kg and 7100 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4445 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8636 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3861 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 838 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |