- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 822C vs. Madill 2200B
Tigercat 822C vs. Madill 2200B
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
5 reasons to buy Madill 2200B:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 760 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 490 l. | 48 % more or 456.4 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 34291.6 kg and 25401.2 kg | 26 % more or 8890.4 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3148.6 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3657.6 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 8 Berco track chain roller on each side |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4025 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3148.6 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |