- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 822C vs. Madill 3200C
Tigercat 822C vs. Madill 3200C
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
5 reasons to buy Madill 3200C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 760 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 889.6 l. and 490 l. | 45 % more or 399.6 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 35833.8 kg and 25401.2 kg | 29 % more or 10432.6 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3200.4 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3657.6 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Detroit diesel |
| Model | QSL9 and S50 |
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |