- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 822C vs. Tigercat 845C
Tigercat 822C vs. Tigercat 845C
5 reasons to buy Tigercat 822C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 760 mm and 690 mm | 9 % more or 70 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 24494 kg and 25490 kg | 4 % less or 996 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 205.1 kW | 8 % more or 18.6 kW |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8050 mm | 4 % more or 330 mm |
| Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 4165 mm | 22 % less or 915 mm |
6 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 490 l. | 49 % more or 480 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 25 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 110 amperes | 21 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 27215.5 kg and 25401.2 kg | 7 % more or 1814.3 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4445 mm and 4900 mm |
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3435 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3360 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | QSL9 and 906 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 200 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4025 kg and 4990 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4445 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4900 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 690 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm |