- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 845C vs. Caterpillar 552
Tigercat 845C vs. Caterpillar 552
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 95 amperes | 32 % more or 45 amperes |
Operational weight without attachment | 25490 kg and 35680 kg | 29 % less or 10190 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 690 mm | 22 % more or 199 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 190 l. | 49 % more or 180 l. |
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 970 l. | 18 % more or 211 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 47174 kg and 27215.5 kg | 42 % more or 19958.5 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3435 mm and 3327 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm and 3962 mm |
Dimensional length | 4900 mm and 9423 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | 906 and C9 ACERT |
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Caterpillar |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215.9 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4990 kg and 9400 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4900 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm |
2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
5. Clearance | 690 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |