- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 845C vs. Madill 2250B
Tigercat 845C vs. Madill 2250B
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 845C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 70 amperes | 50 % more or 70 amperes |
3 reasons to buy Madill 2250B:
Sizes
| Clearance | 737.6 mm and 690 mm | 6 % more or 47.6 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 27215.5 kg | 33 % more or 13154.2 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 2795 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3200.4 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm and 3733.8 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
| Model | 906 and QSL |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711.2 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4990 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3360 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 690 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |