- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. Caterpillar 532
Tigercat 860C vs. Caterpillar 532
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 31450 kg | 13 % less or 4120 kg |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 38555 kg and 27215.5 kg | 29 % more or 11339.5 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3962 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5380 mm and 8611 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215.9 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 7100 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5380 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8611 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |