- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. John Deere 759J
Tigercat 860C vs. John Deere 759J
6 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 136 l. | 28 % more or 54 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 583 l. | 40 % more or 387 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 27215.5 kg and 26036.2 kg | 4 % more or 1179.3 kg |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8300 mm | 2 % more or 160 mm |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 759J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 711 mm and 710 mm | 0 % more or 1 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 27242.8 kg and 27330 kg | 0 % less or 87.2 kg |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 3530 mm and 4800 mm | 26 % less or 1270 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3048 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3930 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm and 1930 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 8 |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 4720 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3048 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3930 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 711 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1930 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3530 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8300 mm |