- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. Madill 3200C
Tigercat 860C vs. Madill 3200C
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 889.6 l. | 8 % more or 80.4 l. |
4 reasons to buy Madill 3200C:
Sizes
Clearance | 762 mm and 710 mm | 7 % more or 52 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 35833.8 kg and 27215.5 kg | 24 % more or 8618.3 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200.4 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3657.6 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm and 3221.7 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | QSL9 and S50 |
Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Detroit diesel |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3657.6 mm |
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3221.7 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |