- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. Madill T2250B
Tigercat 860C vs. Madill T2250B
2 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
5 reasons to buy Madill T2250B:
Sizes
Clearance | 737.6 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 27.6 mm |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 27215.5 kg | 33 % more or 13154.2 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side and 8 | 11 % more or 1 Berco |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200.4 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3733.8 mm |
Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm and 2795 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Model | QSL9 and QSL |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711.2 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm |
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |