- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 860C vs. Tigercat L870C
Tigercat 860C vs. Tigercat L870C
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 27330 kg and 35640 kg | 23 % less or 8310 kg |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat L870C:
Carrier
| Traction force | 33112.2 kg and 27215.5 kg | 18 % more or 5896.7 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3710 mm |
| Clearance | 710 mm and 710 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5380 mm and 5280 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm and 1420 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 970 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 190 l. |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8460 mm |
| Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 4800 mm |
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 6032.8 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5380 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5280 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1445 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm |