vs.

      Tigercat 860C vs. Tigercat LX822C

      4 reasons to buy Tigercat 860C:

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 27330 kg and 32660 kg 16 % less or 5330 kg
      Fuel Capacity 970 l. and 490 l. 49 % more or 480 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 190 l. and 165 l. 13 % more or 25 l.

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm and 8380 mm 1 % more or 80 mm

      4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:

      Sizes

      Clearance 760 mm and 710 mm 7 % more or 50 mm

      Carrier

      Traction force 29937.1 kg and 27215.5 kg 9 % more or 2721.6 kg
      Rolling bearings number on either side 9 and 8 11 % more or 1

      Booms

      Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm and 4800 mm 32 % less or 1550 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Dimensional length 5380 mm and 4750 mm
      Overall width 3275 mm and 3275 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3300 mm and 3730 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 110 amperes

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Cummins
      Model QSL9 and QSL9
      Full power 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW
      Power measured at 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min

      Carrier

      Shoe dimensions 610 mm and 710 mm
      Caterpillar track pitch 200 mm and 200 mm

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 6040 kg and 4581.3 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 5380 mm 1. Dimensional length 4750 mm
      2. Overall width 3275 mm 2. Overall width 3275 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3300 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3730 mm
      5. Clearance 710 mm 5. Clearance 760 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 710 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm