- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat 870C vs. Madill T2200B
Tigercat 870C vs. Madill T2200B
4 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:
Sizes
Clearance | 710 mm and 661.4 mm | 7 % more or 48.6 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 Berco track chain roller on each side | 11 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Madill T2200B:
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
Traction force | 34291.6 kg and 33112.2 kg | 3 % more or 1179.4 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm and 2795 mm |
Overall width | 3300 mm and 3252.2 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3810 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSL |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6040 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 661.4 mm |
8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2795 mm |
2. Overall width | 3300 mm | 2. Overall width | 3252.2 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3810 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |