- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L845C vs. Caterpillar 551
Tigercat L845C vs. Caterpillar 551
2 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 95 amperes | 32 % more or 45 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 551:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 685 mm | 23 % more or 204 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 31057 kg and 32480 kg | 4 % less or 1423 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 970 l. | 18 % more or 211 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 190 l. | 49 % more or 180 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 47174 kg and 29937.1 kg | 37 % more or 17236.9 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4940 mm and 9423 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3327 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm and 3658 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | 906 and C9 ACERT |
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 711 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 215.9 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 5170 kg and 5000 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 685 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4940 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |