- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L845C vs. Madill 1250
Tigercat L845C vs. Madill 1250
4 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 832.8 l. | 14 % more or 137.2 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 90 amperes | 36 % more or 50 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 9 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 Berco track chain roller on each side | 11 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Madill 1250:
Sizes
| Clearance | 710.2 mm and 685 mm | 4 % more or 25.2 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 212.5 kW and 205.1 kW | 3 % more or 7.4 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 32114.3 kg and 29937.1 kg | 7 % more or 2177.2 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3301 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm and 3605.8 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 2133.6 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Isuzu |
| Model | 906 and 6HK1X |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 685 mm | 5. Clearance | 710.2 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2133.6 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3301 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3605.8 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |