- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L845C vs. Madill T2250C
Tigercat L845C vs. Madill T2250C
2 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 100 amperes | 29 % more or 40 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2000 rev / min | 9 % more or 200 rev |
4 reasons to buy Madill T2250C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 737.6 mm and 685 mm | 7 % more or 52.6 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1097.8 l. and 970 l. | 12 % more or 127.8 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 205.1 kW | 10 % more or 22.3 kW |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 29937.1 kg | 26 % more or 10432.6 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3453.4 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm and 3910.6 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm and 2895.6 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | 906 and QSL |
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 711.2 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 685 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2895.6 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |