- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L845C vs. Tigercat LX822C
Tigercat L845C vs. Tigercat LX822C
5 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 25 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 110 amperes | 21 % more or 30 amperes |
| Operational weight without attachment | 32480 kg and 32660 kg | 1 % less or 180 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 490 l. | 49 % more or 480 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 760 mm and 685 mm | 10 % more or 75 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 205.1 kW | 8 % more or 18.6 kW |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 4165 mm | 22 % less or 915 mm |
| Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8050 mm | 4 % more or 330 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm and 3730 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4940 mm and 4750 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3275 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | 906 and QSL9 |
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 200 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 710 mm |
| Traction force | 29937.1 kg and 29937.1 kg |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 5170 kg and 4581.3 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4940 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 685 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm |