- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L870C vs. Caterpillar 551
Tigercat L870C vs. Caterpillar 551
1 reasons to buy Tigercat L870C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 551:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 31057 kg and 35640 kg | 13 % less or 4583 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 970 l. | 18 % more or 211 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 190 l. | 49 % more or 180 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 47174 kg and 33112.2 kg | 30 % more or 14061.8 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 3658 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3327 mm |
Dimensional length | 5280 mm and 9423 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 215.9 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6032.8 kg and 5000 kg |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5280 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 9423 mm |
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm |
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |