- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat L870C vs. John Deere 903J
Tigercat L870C vs. John Deere 903J
4 reasons to buy Tigercat L870C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm and 8400 mm | 1 % more or 60 mm |
| Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 5000 mm | 4 % less or 200 mm |
6 reasons to buy John Deere 903J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 749 mm and 710 mm | 5 % more or 39 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
| Operational weight without attachment | 28730.5 kg and 35640 kg | 19 % less or 6909.5 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 146.7 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 33701.9 kg and 33112.2 kg | 2 % more or 589.7 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3170 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 3860 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm and 3000 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 216 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 6032.8 kg and 6430 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 1420 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3000 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3170 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 749 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5000 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm |