- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. Caterpillar 511
Tigercat LX822C vs. Caterpillar 511
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 184.2 kW | 18 % more or 39.5 kW |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 511:
Sizes
| Clearance | 762 mm and 760 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 24362 kg and 32660 kg | 25 % less or 8298 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 30391 kg and 29937.1 kg | 1 % more or 453.9 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3378 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4750 mm and 8458 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 7100 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | 26 degrees and degrees |
| Lateral part | 20 degrees and degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8458 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |