- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. Caterpillar 532
Tigercat LX822C vs. Caterpillar 532
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Sizes
| Clearance | 889 mm and 760 mm | 15 % more or 129 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 31450 kg and 32660 kg | 4 % less or 1210 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 38555 kg and 29937.1 kg | 22 % more or 8617.9 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3962 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4750 mm and 8611 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215.9 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 7100 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | 26 degrees and 20 degrees |
| Lateral part | 20 degrees and 11 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4750 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8611 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |