- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. John Deere 753J
Tigercat LX822C vs. John Deere 753J
6 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
Clearance | 760 mm and 740 mm | 3 % more or 20 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 165 l. and 136 l. | 18 % more or 29 l. |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
Traction force | 29937.1 kg and 26036.2 kg | 13 % more or 3900.9 kg |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 753J:
Operation
Operational weight without attachment | 22897.3 kg and 32660 kg | 30 % less or 9762.7 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 583 l. and 490 l. | 16 % more or 93 l. |
Booms
Maximum cutting radius | 8382 mm and 8380 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm and 3250 mm | 2 % less or 49.6 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3275 mm and 3180 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3450 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 4717.4 kg |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3180 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm |
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 740 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3200.4 mm |
10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8382 mm |