- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX822C vs. Madill T2250B
Tigercat LX822C vs. Madill T2250B
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 760 mm and 737.6 mm | 3 % more or 22.4 mm |
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
4 reasons to buy Madill T2250B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 490 l. | 48 % more or 456.4 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Traction force | 40369.7 kg and 29937.1 kg | 26 % more or 10432.6 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3200.4 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3733.8 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 711.2 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 Berco excavator rollers on each side |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4581.3 kg and 9888.3 kg |
Alignment device
| Front end | 26 degrees and 27 degrees |
| Rear | 6 degrees and 3 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200.4 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3733.8 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 737.6 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm |