vs.

      Tigercat LX822C vs. Tigercat 870C

      2 reasons to buy Tigercat LX822C:

      Sizes

      Clearance 760 mm and 710 mm 7 % more or 50 mm

      Booms

      Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm and 4800 mm 32 % less or 1550 mm

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat 870C:

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 30331.7 kg and 32660 kg 7 % less or 2328.3 kg
      Fuel Capacity 970 l. and 490 l. 49 % more or 480 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 190 l. and 165 l. 13 % more or 25 l.

      Carrier

      Traction force 33112.2 kg and 29937.1 kg 10 % more or 3175.1 kg

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm and 8380 mm 1 % more or 80 mm

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Overall width 3275 mm and 3300 mm
      Height to cab upper part 3730 mm and 3300 mm
      Dimensional length 4750 mm and 5540 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 110 amperes

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and Cummins
      Model QSL9 and QSL9
      Full power 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW
      Power measured at 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 200 mm and 215 mm
      Shoe dimensions 710 mm and 610 mm
      Rolling bearings number on either side 9 and 9

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 4581.3 kg and 6040 kg

      Images

      Sizes

      1. Dimensional length 4750 mm 1. Dimensional length 5540 mm
      2. Overall width 3275 mm 2. Overall width 3300 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3730 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3300 mm
      5. Clearance 760 mm 5. Clearance 710 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 710 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 4800 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8460 mm